Smalltalk Objection Handling
Objection handling is a standard part of sales preparation. Can it be applied to Smalltalk ?
Here is the start of a list of possible objections to using Smalltalk and some answers. The idea is for the Smalltalk community to provide the answers, pointers to examples etc.:
- No one uses it any more
- Yes they do, may be not as many as use Java or Visual Basic. To find a Smalltalk community take a look at:
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk, comp.lang.smalltalk.advocacy etc.
- Blogs: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/userblogs as a staarting point
- These companies: http://www.whysmalltalk.com/production/index.htm
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk, comp.lang.smalltalk.advocacy etc.
- Yes they do, may be not as many as use Java or Visual Basic. To find a Smalltalk community take a look at:
- You can't do web pages in it
- Yes , you can ! And blogs! See the cincom reference above for an example. Example code can be found .....
- Yes , you can ! And blogs! See the cincom reference above for an example. Example code can be found .....
- The image is bloated
- Not by comparison with, say, a JDK or .NET environment. The well known Smalltalk application bottomFeeder is only approx. 7M. It is upgradeable and can have other Smalltalk plugins loaded.
- Not by comparison with, say, a JDK or .NET environment. The well known Smalltalk application bottomFeeder is only approx. 7M. It is upgradeable and can have other Smalltalk plugins loaded.
- There is no equivalent to Java Applets
[I'll be looking at the Cincom Web Tutorial on this
- It is hard to call other languages
See examples ...
- It is hard to call from other languages
See examples ....
- There is no strong typing
There is much debate about this topic in language circles thse days, and many would cite the lack of stong type checking at all times as a benefit. Many of the benefits of strong typing can be countered by "test-first" strategies.
To be continued....
No comments:
Post a Comment